Comments on: OOP is Mature, not Dead

By: Todd

Todd — Mon, 21 Nov 2011 00:16:01 +0000

Very good advice! I have been previously looking for something such as this for a time now. Appreciation!

By: karen millen outlet

karen millen outlet — Mon, 08 Aug 2011 21:54:00 +0000

Apple now has Rhapsody as an app, which is a great start, but it is currently hampered by the inability to store locally on your iPod, and has a dismal 64kbps bit rate. If this changes, then it will somewhat negate this advantage for the Zune, but the 10 songs per month will still be a big plus in Zune Pass’ favor.

By: jobs in graphic design

jobs in graphic design — Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:20:22 +0000

I absolutely agree with what you have said. In reality, I browsed through your additional posts and I do think that you are absolutely right. Best wishes with this blog.

By: Mar Matthias Darin

Mar Matthias Darin — Fri, 07 Jan 2011 07:36:12 +0000

In terms of the articles “OOP is dead”, I believe the context is that explicit programming languages that focus on OOP are dead. Any programming language since C can be written with an object oriented methodology. Having an explicit language dependency only obfuscates the true intent in solving the problem.

In that context, I do believe OOP is dead. Programming is more about the process of solving the problem, not the methodology of solving that problem. I have seen C++ code that was absolutely horrid even compared to BASIC in the context of design readability.

Many programmers have locked themselves into a mindset that you need an OOP language to use object oriented methodology and as such, have really added to the problem of solving the task at hand in the simplest terms. Some tasks need a simple approach that OOP can over complicate.

Any programming methodology can produce horrible code and beautiful code. Its about picking the right language to solve the task, not the language itself.

That is OOP’s biggest failure, limiting the language for any given task.

By: chelseahandler

chelseahandler — Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:27:02 +0000

enjoyed this article!

By: jessica

jessica — Tue, 03 Aug 2010 19:06:12 +0000

it just hasn’t been acceptable to write spaghetti code and procedural programming is mostly conducive to that.

By: kevin

kevin — Thu, 03 Jun 2010 03:42:18 +0000

PHP6 will include any of those. Closures were declined at some point, as far as I remember.

By: Rodolfo Zecher

Rodolfo Zecher — Wed, 02 Jun 2010 11:20:46 +0000

Awesome this is a great share, thank you for putting this article together! Saw this post tweeted by odegard media on twitter. Looking forward to more and will reply to those who comment back for next months group meetup!

By: Avery Depew

Avery Depew — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:26:48 +0000

very good, thankss

By: Fernando

Fernando — Sat, 06 Jun 2009 16:36:27 +0000

OOP .Net bast generics and extensive
vs
dbata BAse oriented applications.