Comments on: un-PEAR-ing http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2006/07/05/un-pear-ing/ PHP Programming, Web Development, PHP Advocacy and PHP Best Practices. Wed, 08 Sep 2010 16:32:01 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: jessica http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2006/07/05/un-pear-ing/#comment-85169 jessica Wed, 25 Aug 2010 15:54:54 +0000 http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2006/07/05/un-pear-ing/#comment-85169 yes, you are right, thanks very much yes, you are right, thanks very much

]]> By: Eugene Panin http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2006/07/05/un-pear-ing/#comment-26752 Eugene Panin Wed, 09 Aug 2006 14:18:16 +0000 http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2006/07/05/un-pear-ing/#comment-26752 I also found PEAR has a lot of waste. Tried several classes and spit after I saw what they have inside. But in other hand PEAR contain a lot of good and quality classes. I like PEAR::DB (PEAR::MDB2 now) and PEAR::HTTP_Request very much - their creators are gods! I also found PEAR has a lot of waste. Tried several classes and spit after I saw what they have inside.
But in other hand PEAR contain a lot of good and quality classes. I like PEAR::DB (PEAR::MDB2 now) and PEAR::HTTP_Request very much – their creators are gods!

]]> By: Arnaud http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2006/07/05/un-pear-ing/#comment-23230 Arnaud Thu, 06 Jul 2006 07:58:01 +0000 http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2006/07/05/un-pear-ing/#comment-23230 PEAR will most likely not maintain a fork, it would be a waste of resources. Channels make it easy to install packages anyway so it is pretty trivial to install it when you need the dependency. PEAR will most likely not maintain a fork, it would be a waste of resources. Channels make it easy to install packages anyway so it is pretty trivial to install it when you need the dependency.

]]> By: Pierre http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2006/07/05/un-pear-ing/#comment-23226 Pierre Thu, 06 Jul 2006 06:28:29 +0000 http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2006/07/05/un-pear-ing/#comment-23226 It is no surprise, Sebastian envisaged this since quite a long time. I consider it is very good for all of us that he finnally took a decision. The decision itself is the best one for phpunit and PEAR. It is in my opinion absolutely not critical for PEAR. "pear run-tests" does support many tests tools. It is no surprise, Sebastian envisaged this since quite a long time. I consider it is very good for all of us that he finnally took a decision. The decision itself is the best one for phpunit and PEAR.

It is in my opinion absolutely not critical for PEAR. “pear run-tests” does support many tests tools.

]]> By: Sebastian http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2006/07/05/un-pear-ing/#comment-23221 Sebastian Thu, 06 Jul 2006 05:31:31 +0000 http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2006/07/05/un-pear-ing/#comment-23221 I don't see a problem with that. PEAR always supported other testing mechanisms and will for sure in the future. I don’t see a problem with that. PEAR always supported other testing mechanisms and will for sure in the future.

]]>