<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Backward compatibilty and web host adoption of PHP 5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2005/10/02/backward-compatibilty-and-web-host-adoption-of-php-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2005/10/02/backward-compatibilty-and-web-host-adoption-of-php-5/</link>
	<description>PHP Programming, Web Development, PHP Advocacy and PHP Best Practices.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:53:56 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Professional PHP &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Of PHP References and Compatibility</title>
		<link>http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2005/10/02/backward-compatibilty-and-web-host-adoption-of-php-5/#comment-11766</link>
		<dc:creator>Professional PHP &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Of PHP References and Compatibility</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 05:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.procata.com/blog/?p=143#comment-11766</guid>
		<description>[...] Following up on the Backward compatibilty and web host adoption of PHP 5 post from two weeks ago, I got a pretty good education about the problem with taking a reference of $this. The best summary is in this bug report. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Following up on the Backward compatibilty and web host adoption of PHP 5 post from two weeks ago, I got a pretty good education about the problem with taking a reference of $this. The best summary is in this bug report. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2005/10/02/backward-compatibilty-and-web-host-adoption-of-php-5/#comment-11343</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.procata.com/blog/?p=143#comment-11343</guid>
		<description>If you mean talk as in bring it to people&#039;s attention (say by filing a bug report, posting to internals and blogging about it) before the final release rather than bitch about it afterwards, yup, thats what I want to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you mean talk as in bring it to people&#8217;s attention (say by filing a bug report, posting to internals and blogging about it) before the final release rather than bitch about it afterwards, yup, thats what I want to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antony</title>
		<link>http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2005/10/02/backward-compatibilty-and-web-host-adoption-of-php-5/#comment-11338</link>
		<dc:creator>Antony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 22:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.procata.com/blog/?p=143#comment-11338</guid>
		<description>&gt;I&#039;m afraid that there are probably other BC breaks in 5.1.
That means only that you need to start testing it before it gets out.
But I&#039;m afraid that *nobody* of those people that talk about &quot;slowing down&quot;, &quot;stuck&quot;, &quot;more BC breaks to come&quot; etc. really care about it, most of them only want to talk.
Obviously PHP Group is unable to test RCs with each and every piece of existing software to check BC, so it&#039;s time for you to start caring about *your code* and its status with the upcoming releases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;I&#8217;m afraid that there are probably other BC breaks in 5.1.<br />
That means only that you need to start testing it before it gets out.<br />
But I&#8217;m afraid that *nobody* of those people that talk about &#8220;slowing down&#8221;, &#8220;stuck&#8221;, &#8220;more BC breaks to come&#8221; etc. really care about it, most of them only want to talk.<br />
Obviously PHP Group is unable to test RCs with each and every piece of existing software to check BC, so it&#8217;s time for you to start caring about *your code* and its status with the upcoming releases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pavel Chtchevaev</title>
		<link>http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2005/10/02/backward-compatibilty-and-web-host-adoption-of-php-5/#comment-11232</link>
		<dc:creator>Pavel Chtchevaev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 06:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.procata.com/blog/?p=143#comment-11232</guid>
		<description>&gt; The use of $x =&amp; $this is illegal because you can then do $x = new
&gt; foo(); and then you replace the current object, which you should
&gt; not be allowed to do.

But i will never do $x = new foo();, that&#039;s the problem! Why not throwing fatal when it actually happens?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; The use of $x =&amp; $this is illegal because you can then do $x = new<br />
&gt; foo(); and then you replace the current object, which you should<br />
&gt; not be allowed to do.</p>
<p>But i will never do $x = new foo();, that&#8217;s the problem! Why not throwing fatal when it actually happens?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rowan</title>
		<link>http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2005/10/02/backward-compatibilty-and-web-host-adoption-of-php-5/#comment-11229</link>
		<dc:creator>Rowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 20:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.procata.com/blog/?p=143#comment-11229</guid>
		<description>BC breaks are not just OS problem, this is software reality, if you&#039;ve ever been on a big software dev team when it comes time for a major version change of language/tools, stuff breaks *all* the time. Fact of life, get your change control processes in place, move on. I&#039;ve seen it with Delphi and 3rd party apps, a team I worked on would test for months on a new version of delphi, quite a while after it was released, to make sure the entire code base would work, only then after changes etc made would it roll out to the entire team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BC breaks are not just OS problem, this is software reality, if you&#8217;ve ever been on a big software dev team when it comes time for a major version change of language/tools, stuff breaks *all* the time. Fact of life, get your change control processes in place, move on. I&#8217;ve seen it with Delphi and 3rd party apps, a team I worked on would test for months on a new version of delphi, quite a while after it was released, to make sure the entire code base would work, only then after changes etc made would it roll out to the entire team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien Seguy</title>
		<link>http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2005/10/02/backward-compatibilty-and-web-host-adoption-of-php-5/#comment-11225</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien Seguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 13:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.procata.com/blog/?p=143#comment-11225</guid>
		<description>Nexen is now crediting about 4% of PHP 5, (here http://www.nexen.net/interview/index.php?id=50). I should have the october figures ready later this week. 

I confirm that version evolution from 4.3.x to 4.3.x+1 gets usually 2 figure digits in a single month, while PHP 5 is still so low. PHP 5 is gaining very slowly everymonth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nexen is now crediting about 4% of PHP 5, (here <a href="http://www.nexen.net/interview/index.php?id=50)" rel="nofollow">http://www.nexen.net/interview/index.php?id=50)</a>. I should have the october figures ready later this week. </p>
<p>I confirm that version evolution from 4.3.x to 4.3.x+1 gets usually 2 figure digits in a single month, while PHP 5 is still so low. PHP 5 is gaining very slowly everymonth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierre</title>
		<link>http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2005/10/02/backward-compatibilty-and-web-host-adoption-of-php-5/#comment-11224</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 12:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.procata.com/blog/?p=143#comment-11224</guid>
		<description>I suppose you are talking about #34358. This bug has been reopened and assigned.

I agree that the error message is not that clear, but the problem ends in the same level as the one we had fixed in 5.0.5 or 4.4.0.


--Pierre</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose you are talking about #34358. This bug has been reopened and assigned.</p>
<p>I agree that the error message is not that clear, but the problem ends in the same level as the one we had fixed in 5.0.5 or 4.4.0.</p>
<p>&#8211;Pierre</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emil Tamas</title>
		<link>http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2005/10/02/backward-compatibilty-and-web-host-adoption-of-php-5/#comment-11223</link>
		<dc:creator>Emil Tamas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 11:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.procata.com/blog/?p=143#comment-11223</guid>
		<description>PHP 5 lost it&#039;s momentum and will probably never catch it again (perhaps PHP6 will have it better) . 
BC is something where OS sucks big time and commercial software rulez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PHP 5 lost it&#8217;s momentum and will probably never catch it again (perhaps PHP6 will have it better) .<br />
BC is something where OS sucks big time and commercial software rulez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soenke</title>
		<link>http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2005/10/02/backward-compatibilty-and-web-host-adoption-of-php-5/#comment-11219</link>
		<dc:creator>soenke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 09:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.procata.com/blog/?p=143#comment-11219</guid>
		<description>[3 Oct 10:22am CEST] dmitry@php.net

Fixed in CVS HEAD and PHP_5_1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[3 Oct 10:22am CEST] <a href="mailto:dmitry@php.net">dmitry@php.net</a></p>
<p>Fixed in CVS HEAD and PHP_5_1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derick</title>
		<link>http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2005/10/02/backward-compatibilty-and-web-host-adoption-of-php-5/#comment-11217</link>
		<dc:creator>Derick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 07:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.procata.com/blog/?p=143#comment-11217</guid>
		<description>The use of $x =&amp; $this is illegal because you can then do $x = new foo(); and then you replace the current object, which you should not be allowed to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The use of $x =&amp; $this is illegal because you can then do $x = new foo(); and then you replace the current object, which you should not be allowed to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

