Comments on: Microbenchmarks of single and double qouting. http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2005/03/08/microbenchmarks-of-single-and-double-qouting/ PHP Programming, Web Development, PHP Advocacy and PHP Best Practices. Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:08:56 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: zawmn http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2005/03/08/microbenchmarks-of-single-and-double-qouting/#comment-84742 zawmn Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:11:00 +0000 http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2005/03/08/microbenchmarks-of-single-and-double-qouting/#comment-84742 $a = "Hello "; $b = "World"; (a) $c = $a.$b; (b) $c = "$a$b"; I would like to know which one is faster to concat (a) or (b). OR if there is another faster way to contact, let me know. $a = “Hello “;

$b = “World”;

(a) $c = $a.$b;

(b) $c = “$a$b”;

I would like to know which one is faster to concat (a) or (b). OR if there is another faster way to contact, let me know.

]]> By: Dan http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2005/03/08/microbenchmarks-of-single-and-double-qouting/#comment-22993 Dan Tue, 04 Jul 2006 05:18:28 +0000 http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2005/03/08/microbenchmarks-of-single-and-double-qouting/#comment-22993 I guess that one uses microtime(). Of course the numbers will be different on different setups, but the relative results are what is important. I don't see where this person's test could be considered useless. It seems perfectly valid and well-constructed to me. I wish I could subscribe to these comments, because this is a topic in which I am interested. If anyone could drop me an e-mail regarding any important developments, I'd really really appreciate it. :-) I guess that one uses microtime(). Of course the numbers will be different on different setups, but the relative results are what is important. I don’t see where this person’s test could be considered useless. It seems perfectly valid and well-constructed to me. I wish I could subscribe to these comments, because this is a topic in which I am interested. If anyone could drop me an e-mail regarding any important developments, I’d really really appreciate it. :-)

]]> By: Dan http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2005/03/08/microbenchmarks-of-single-and-double-qouting/#comment-22991 Dan Tue, 04 Jul 2006 05:06:59 +0000 http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2005/03/08/microbenchmarks-of-single-and-double-qouting/#comment-22991 http://us2.php.net/echo#66391 http://us2.php.net/echo#66391

]]> By: Scott Mattocks http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2005/03/08/microbenchmarks-of-single-and-double-qouting/#comment-16029 Scott Mattocks Fri, 14 Apr 2006 12:56:21 +0000 http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2005/03/08/microbenchmarks-of-single-and-double-qouting/#comment-16029 In your test, you used one gigantic string. This is not very realistic. It is much more likely that a script will contain a whole lot of small strings. For example, a configuration file could easily have 2000 strings with just one or two words. Can you give me an idea of the difference between single and double quotes for lots of little strings. In your test, you used one gigantic string. This is not very realistic. It is much more likely that a script will contain a whole lot of small strings. For example, a configuration file could easily have 2000 strings with just one or two words. Can you give me an idea of the difference between single and double quotes for lots of little strings.

]]> By: templaterie blog - Quotes in PHP http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2005/03/08/microbenchmarks-of-single-and-double-qouting/#comment-9738 templaterie blog - Quotes in PHP Sun, 29 May 2005 22:54:20 +0000 http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2005/03/08/microbenchmarks-of-single-and-double-qouting/#comment-9738 [...] Forum die Antwort, die Performance sei unterschiedlich. Singel ist schneller. Stimmt wohl: die mit singel quotes wird die amerikanische Verfassung [...] [...] Forum die Antwort, die Performance sei unterschiedlich. Singel ist schneller. Stimmt wohl: die mit singel quotes wird die amerikanische Verfassung [...]

]]> By: Jeff Moore’s Blog » Blog Archive » The Usability of Input Filtering http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2005/03/08/microbenchmarks-of-single-and-double-qouting/#comment-7576 Jeff Moore’s Blog » Blog Archive » The Usability of Input Filtering Fri, 01 Apr 2005 06:24:59 +0000 http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2005/03/08/microbenchmarks-of-single-and-double-qouting/#comment-7576 [...] iltering a new examination. My problem with filtering is with usability. The comments to this post are a good example. There are o [...] [...] iltering a new examination. My problem with filtering is with usability. The comments to this post are a good example. There are o [...]

]]> By: :: onpk :: blog PHP, MySQL, développement web & connexe(s) http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2005/03/08/microbenchmarks-of-single-and-double-qouting/#comment-6032 :: onpk :: blog PHP, MySQL, développement web & connexe(s) Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:06:38 +0000 http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2005/03/08/microbenchmarks-of-single-and-double-qouting/#comment-6032 <strong>Les outils de RAD et le monde PHP</strong> Le 14 avril prochain aura lieu le prochain Rendez-Vous AFUP : DreamWeaver, un outil de RAD pour PHP. Les inscriptions sont ouvertes depuis 2 jours seulement et au rythme où vont les choses, ça sera très vite plein (on peut accueillir 50 personnes et je... Les outils de RAD et le monde PHP

Le 14 avril prochain aura lieu le prochain Rendez-Vous AFUP : DreamWeaver, un outil de RAD pour PHP. Les inscriptions sont ouvertes depuis 2 jours seulement et au rythme où vont les choses, ça sera très vite plein (on peut accueillir 50 personnes et je…

]]> By: Pure-PHP http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2005/03/08/microbenchmarks-of-single-and-double-qouting/#comment-6030 Pure-PHP Wed, 09 Mar 2005 17:53:40 +0000 http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2005/03/08/microbenchmarks-of-single-and-double-qouting/#comment-6030 Maybe you shuold use htmlentities, because php tags are not displayed in comment. For example in my last comment Answer: < ?php echo $answer; ?>! Maybe you shuold use htmlentities, because php tags are not displayed in comment. For example in my last comment
Answer: < ?php echo $answer; ?>!

]]> By: Hendy Irawan http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2005/03/08/microbenchmarks-of-single-and-double-qouting/#comment-6027 Hendy Irawan Wed, 09 Mar 2005 13:04:52 +0000 http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2005/03/08/microbenchmarks-of-single-and-double-qouting/#comment-6027 Whew! I never knew people worried about this teeny little teetsy bit of performance so much!! Phew! Whew!

I never knew people worried about this teeny little teetsy bit of performance so much!! Phew!

]]> By: Pure-PHP http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2005/03/08/microbenchmarks-of-single-and-double-qouting/#comment-6026 Pure-PHP Wed, 09 Mar 2005 07:29:37 +0000 http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2005/03/08/microbenchmarks-of-single-and-double-qouting/#comment-6026 Answer: ! is faster, because there is no concatentation Answer: ! is faster, because there is no concatentation

]]>