<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PHP 5 adoption</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2005/01/20/php-5-adoption/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2005/01/20/php-5-adoption/</link>
	<description>PHP Programming, Web Development, PHP Advocacy and PHP Best Practices.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:53:56 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Professional PHP &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Backward compatibilty and web host adoption of PHP 5</title>
		<link>http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2005/01/20/php-5-adoption/#comment-11211</link>
		<dc:creator>Professional PHP &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Backward compatibilty and web host adoption of PHP 5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 03:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.procata.com/blog/archives/2005/01/20/php-5-adoption/#comment-11211</guid>
		<description>[...] I blogged about PHP 5 adoption in january when a survey put the adoption rate at 1.5%. I ran across a thread at web hosting talk, which asks Php5 rare, why? Bugs, backward compatibility problems, and the difficulty of running two versions at once come up as issues. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I blogged about PHP 5 adoption in january when a survey put the adoption rate at 1.5%. I ran across a thread at web hosting talk, which asks Php5 rare, why? Bugs, backward compatibility problems, and the difficulty of running two versions at once come up as issues. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

