Comments on: PEAR Templates

By: Danette Haffling

Danette Haffling — Wed, 08 Feb 2012 02:59:47 +0000

hey all, I was just checking out this weblog and I seriously admire the basis from the report, and have absolutely nothing to do, so if any person would like to to have an engrossing convo about it, please speak to me on AIM, my name is heather smith

By: Randa Knoble

Randa Knoble — Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:08:24 +0000

Great write-up, I’m normal visitor of one’s site, maintain up the excellent operate, and It’s going to be a regular visitor for a long time. “Good nonsense is good sense in disguise.” by Josh Billings.

By: Allegro Gry Planszowe

Allegro Gry Planszowe — Wed, 04 Jan 2012 20:23:10 +0000

I cling on to listening to the rumor lecture about getting free online grant applications so I have been looking around for the top site to get one. Could you tell me please, where could i get some?

By: coupon

coupon — Sun, 05 Jun 2011 06:24:59 +0000

Important?…

Is this really updated?…

By: compro oro roma

compro oro roma — Sat, 23 Apr 2011 19:42:05 +0000

You actually completed a number of fine details there. I did so a search around the subject matter and located most people will probably agree with the site

By: Tharanga

Tharanga — Wed, 27 May 2009 11:47:48 +0000

echo "hello";

By: MIchiel van der Blonk

MIchiel van der Blonk — Fri, 14 Dec 2007 18:53:57 +0000

And why not follow the same approach as with all the other packages: have a PEAR_TEMPLATE class that can be configured to use either Savant, Flexy, Smarty, you name it. Yes that brings a performance issue, but if you want the best performance you shouldn’t even use templates.

By: Lukas

Lukas — Fri, 18 Jun 2004 13:40:50 +0000

The reason we have more “soap operas” than PHP is that our development process is much more open with a much flatter hirarchy than PHP itself. Anyways it seems like the majority of pear-dev’s seemed to prefer a clean up rather than accepting that due to fairness a mistake must be repeated.

By: Aaron Wormus

Aaron Wormus — Tue, 08 Jun 2004 15:08:49 +0000

PEAR people continually say “We don’t want to see PEAR turn into CPAN or PHPClasses.org”.

What PEAR has above those other repositories is GOOD standards and a Peer Review system. If the package meets technical standards there is no reason why it should not be included. Let the people decide what they want to use.

By: Harry Fuecks

Harry Fuecks — Sat, 05 Jun 2004 08:52:26 +0000

PEAR is becoming PHP’s perpetual SOAP opera. It’s interesting that scraps like this seem to be fewer when it comes to PHP’s own APIs although there are areas of competing interests, such as handling i18n character sets.

Personally think Savant should be part of PEAR simply because it’s down to earth, well documented, mature and people will probably want to use it. Using the criteria identified on the Template View page it should be possible to identify which engines offer exactly the same “style”, which would be a point to eliminate one or other. Think PEAR’s going to need some kind of “depreciated / no longer supported” status.